Who would’ve thought a film about subatomic physics could be so exuberant, inspiring, and virtuous? I was definitely not expecting to love Particle Fever, as I shudderingly recollect my exhausting struggles with college physics. But sure enough, this is easily the best new documentary I’ve seen so far in 2014.
Particle Fever
succeeds as a tale of suspense on two levels.
First of all, it tells the story of the efforts to prove the existence
of Higgs boson particle. Those of us who
followed the news in 2012 know how this saga ended, but even so, Mark
Levinson’s direction and storytelling swept me up in the events unfolding at
CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) on the French-Swiss border.
Levinson
wisely chose to follow six theoretical and experimental physicists who were
heavily invested in this endeavor’s outcome, so we the viewers watch the
narrative unfold through their eyes.
Happily, each of these men and women are superb educators. Courtesy of these physicists and some crafty
graphic work, I now comprehend what was at stake in Geneva from 2007-2012 (and
this from someone who gave up on Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time and
Lawrence Krauss’ A Universe from Nothing).
To
summarize, the Higgs boson particle was the missing and central piece in the
Standard Model of Particle Physics. The
Higgs boson was theorized to give all particles mass and hold all matter
together, allowing it to form atoms.
Without it, the Standard Model would make no sense. The Large Hadron Collider (large indeed, the
hugest structure ever made by humans) at CERN would attempt to smash protons
together at nearly light speed, allowing supremely sensitive cameras to image
the subatomic particles emerging from the collision, including, hopefully, the
Higgs boson.
The
second item of suspense in Particle Fever
relates to the mass of the Higgs boson.
This may not seem like a big deal, but the scientific stakes were quite
high. A lighter boson would steer
physicists towards a fine-tuned, elegant universe of Supersymmetry; a heavier
particle would indicate a chaotic, highly unstable multiverse.
In
case all of this sounds dry and tedious, the scientists are delightful to see
at work and play. CERN physicists rap
goofily, yet with decently rhyming metrics and smart lyrics; and clichéd as it
may be, it’s still pretty funny to watch geniuses of esoteric theory struggle
to get audio on their laptops. More
importantly, the joy of discovery is contagious, and I found myself vicariously
caught up in their triumphs and setbacks.
The
scientists’ life stories sometimes overflow with drama, too. As children, two of the theoretical
physicists escaped war and persecution by fleeing Iran and Turkey with their
parents. Such experiences contrast with
the peaceful cooperation of the CERN scientists, numbering 10,000 and hailing
from over 100 nations.
I
mentioned in my introduction that Particle
Fever is a deeply virtuous film.
This multinational collaboration by great scientific minds (even when
their respective governments clash) offers hope, when daily headlines tempt
thoughtful people to despair.
The
twin virtues of patience and perseverance are abundantly on display, too. Construction on the Large Hadron Collider
began in the mid-1980’s, and some of the theoretical physicists we meet have
waited 30-40 years to see if their life work is borne out by the experimental
data. The Turkish-born scientist, Savas
Dimopoulos, eloquently contrasts the scientific process to making good coffee,
which only takes a few minutes to make and can be quickly discarded if the brew
tastes mediocre. No such luck for these
heroically forbearing figures.
Invigorating,
too, is the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. At one point, David Kaplan, a theoretical
physicist from Johns Hopkins, is quizzed by an economist about the potential
gain from these experiments. Kaplan
unflappably responds, “I have no idea…It could be good for nothing, except for
understanding everything.” (Did I
mention these chaps are highly quotable, too?)
I
suspect that 20 years from now, this film will be considered a valuable
historical document for its portrayal of pivotal scientific events. What a treat that such a film also
invigorates viewers with understanding and hope.
(Particle Fever was not rated by the
MPAA. The film contains occasional salty
language, but I would urge its viewing by all scientifically-inclined teens and
all open-minded adults.)
5 out of 5 stars
No comments:
Post a Comment